Outpriced & Outplayed: India’s Chemical Makers Must Change The Game

Industry news

Outpriced & Outplayed: India’s Chemical Makers Must Change The Game

What I am describing isn’t imagined, it’s a structural competitiveness problem, not just a sales issue. Indian textile chemical manufacturers are caught between high compliance barriers abroad and intense price/innovation pressure at home. But the conclusion shouldn’t be “we’re locked out,” it should be “we need to change how we compete.”

Let’s break this into reality vs. actionable strategy.

1) The Reality Check (Hard but Important)

Europe & Turkey barriers are real

Markets like European Chemicals Agency under REACH Regulation impose:

High registration cost (€50k–€300k per substance)
Toxicology/ecotoxicology data requirements
Only Representative (OR) obligations

Turkey mirrors this via:

KKDIK Regulation

So yes, exporting directly without scale is expensive and slow.

2) Why these markets feel “pro-China”

In countries like Thailand, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Mauritius etc., the advantage isn’t just duty:

China has deep supply chain integration (intermediates → finished chemicals)
Faster product customisation and delivery
Strong dealer / trader network in local language adaptation
Aggressive credit terms
Govt subsidy and export incentives
Lesser pollution norms and govt. support in chemical parks.

Also, many of these countries have trade alignment through blocs like Association of Southeast Asian Nations and bilateral agreements, which indirectly favour Chinese-origin supply chains.

So it’s not just bias, it’s ecosystem advantage.

Meanwhile, imports into India are easier through frameworks like:

World Trade Organization norms
Various FTAs (ASEAN, etc.)

Foreign companies:

Use traders / distributors or SBU-style setups
Import concentrates ( undercut ) and dilute locally
Compete on price + perceived quality

Yes, there are real issues: Import from China to India or alternative route like CHINA to THAILAND / SINGAPORE and then bring it back to India .

Imports at aggressive pricing
Dilution/repacking by traders
Uneven compliance enforcement
Under cut the real value of product

But the answer is targeted correction, not blanket restriction:

Customer bias is also real.

Buyers often think:

China = cheapest + fast innovation
Europe = premium + consistent quality
India = inconsistent (fair or unfair perception)

This perception gap is as big a problem as duty structure.

3) Where the Current Thinking Needs Adjustment

It’s tempting to say: “restrict imports.”
But that approach has limits:

India is part of global trade commitments
Textile exporters in India depend on competitive input chemicals
Protection alone doesn’t build long-term strength

If Indian players rely only on protection, they risk becoming:
costlier + less innovative over time

4) Practical Strategic Moves (What Actually Works)

A) We have to stop competing only on commodity chemistry. If you're selling:

Basic auxiliaries
Commodity pretreatment chemicals

we always lose to China.

Shift toward:

Specialty finishing chemicals – But here Europeans are taking our share
Functional textiles (anti-microbial, water repellent, flame retardant) – Mostly America & Europe cater this
Sustainable chemistry only way forward but again China & Europe dominate here too.

B) So we are forced to use compliance as a weapon, not a barrier.

Instead of avoiding REACH:

We have to register select high-value molecules only
Partner with EU-based Only Representatives
Focus on niche segments where volumes are lower but margins higher

Many successful Indian firms do partial REACH strategy, not full portfolio registration.

But then why not demand the same from Chinese / Turkish or other countries’ chemicals exports to India? Why we are offering them free entry ?

C) Build formulation advantage, not just molecule supply.

Foreign companies win because they sell:

“solutions” not just chemicals

Example:

Instead of selling a softener → sell a process package
Include:

Application support
Machine compatibility
Shade reproducibility

D) Strengthen domestic positioning (this is underused).

India is one of the largest textile markets. Instead of competing only on price:

Build technical service teams
Offer mill-level optimisation (reduce water, energy, reprocessing)

Once you reduce a mill’s cost by 5–10%, they won’t switch easily.

E) Strategic alliances (not ego-driven independence).

If EU/Turkey access is hard:

Do toll manufacturing
Do joint ventures
License formulations

Many companies quietly enter Europe this way.

F) Target alternative export markets smartly.

Instead of focusing only on EU/Turkey:

Go deeper into:

Africa (Ethiopia, Egypt)
Latin America
Central Asia

These markets:

Have lower compliance barriers
Are growing textile hubs

G) Policy advocacy (but specific, not general complaints)

Industry bodies should push for:

Anti-dumping investigations (case-by-case, evidence-based)
Quality control orders (QCOs) for substandard imports
Incentives for REACH registration (shared cost schemes)

5) The Core Problem: Positioning, Not Just Policy

Right now, Indian textile chemical companies are often stuck in the middle:

Not as cheap as China
Not as trusted/innovative as Europe

That’s the most dangerous place to be.

The Way Forward

We need to choose one of three paths with some support from Govt.

Option 1: Low-cost scale player

Compete with China
Requires massive scale + backward integration (need Govt support on subsidy and special chemical manufacturing zone for textile usage)

Option 2: Specialty niche player (most realistic)

High-margin products
Lower volume, high differentiation
Selective global compliance
But we need to compete with Europe as user mind set its towards Europe / American product as its nominated by the buyer where Indian textile / garment manufacture export it .
Why not Govt. put a bracket of 70% made in India on garment retail by any non-Indian brand with complete transparency.

Option 3: Solution provider (strongest long-term)

Chemicals + process + service
Deep integration with textile mills

Bottom Line

The issue isn’t just “foreign companies have easier access.”
It’s that they are playing a different game:

Better branding
Better application support
Better positioning

If Indian manufacturers respond only with pricing or protection demands, they’ll stay under pressure. If they shift to specialty chemistry + technical service + selective global compliance, they can absolutely compete, even in tough markets.

A significant number of small traders are importing finished textile chemicals originating from China but routing them through third countries such as Thailand and Singapore. By doing so, they appear to be leveraging Free Trade Agreements or mis-declaring origin to avoid applicable duties. These products are then sold directly in the Indian market without any value addition_ Arindam Choudhari, CEO Fineotex Chemicals Ltd.

Previous News